The Official New England Ice Hockey DBoard
Click Here to Visit Our Facebook Page
Everyone, it's really this simple...
If your son has a chance to go D1, USPHL is not a good option. If your son is a D3 player than USPHL can be an option.
I think this guy covered it -
Guys advice was pretty much spot on if the dream is D-1. D-3 can come from anywhere. Local D-1 or C.C. high school can get you to D-3 with a year of juniors anywhere provided the kid can skate and has a bit of size. D-1 best bet is to play a couple years of H.S. and pack your bags and hit the Midwest.
Plenty of D-I opportunities in NE without relocating, primarily from the prep school route because it tends to attract the best players, but also from all the other routes discussed. Keep in mind many players with D-I commitments had that commitment or were on the radar before they got to prep or a midget team.
My son plays U16 FS but is only a 3.5 star on Neutral Zone...Should he stop playing?
Now that’s funny! Most of this discussion is nonsense, someone with an agenda, etc. Find the situation that is best for your family and your son, which could range from HS to CC to prep to all the different FS teams, including USPHL or Lovell and everything in between.
All true'ish for forwards. Defensemen on a totally different track and you hardly know what you have until the kid is fully grown / 18'ish
Agree, many 14-15 year old defensemen commits fizzle-out before adulthood. D-3 hockey is FULL of 'the best peewee defensemen in youth hockey.'
Agree too the little 'puck moving dman' is quite a novelty these days but watch teams through midgets / high school / juniors try to win with these guys, it's almost impossible. Even some D-1 programs like B.C. deploy these players because they're the rage but in reality they are finding-out what a liability they are defensively. Most teams need one to quarterback the p.p. and defend coming back if needed on the p.p. and the rage has made teams think they need one on the ice every shift and in almost every case it has been disastrous (look at the Bruins in the playoffs even trying to survive with Krug & Grzelcyk).
So if teams in actuality need one pint-sized 'puck moving defensemen' then they need 5 who can actually play defense, skate, have a reach, defend, play a bit physically and who's first instinct is to defend. As such the 85% of the D-1 kids have to be +6'2" 'ish and the best skater on their team coming up. Not just a 'plus skater' but one that clearly stands out among his peers. Not easy to project on a 14-15 year old as size and skating can change dramatically. One of the best defenders I scouted in the past 5-6 years didn't make his D-I high school varsity team as a freshmen, was totally overlooked because he was too small and by his senior year he was 6'3" and maybe the best skater in his age group and dominated in tournaments against the better local competition.
Sounds like the w****'s mouth...
Fizzle out and fade away factor huge. Keeping pace with development and the desire is hard for a lot of them.
True that -
" D-3 hockey is FULL of 'the best peewee defensemen in youth hockey.' "