Top two lines of a Super 8 team would have no problem playing prep teams. The problem is the depth.
That's a pretty accurate assessment. I'd think if you took the two top lines from two different teams they could hang with an average prep team. Depending on the goal tending of course.
Geez, I hope the kid is a bit smarter than the dad - "Your entire argument that HS is as good as Prep" argument never happened. And the general assumption that the top end D-1 h.s. player is just as good as the prep players is seen every summer and fall at the split season tournaments. If you haven't seen it then you haven't been paying attention.
Kid who played D3 MIAA last year is one of the better 02's in the area.
Was the best player on the ice this past weekend at 16 States vs the over-hyped Jeff Cox/family advisor media creations.
He's moving on to Prep this year, so both points are valid.
Right, who really thinks that the best 300 high school age players coincidentally have parents with the deep pockets necessary to afford prep tuition. Plenty of kids on MIAA high school rosters who could easily crack prep rosters. Might not be first or second line, but....
Easily. Then you factor in the P.G. kids who actually were pretty good high school players before they went prep and I'd say there are plenty. Go watch the midget tournaments and you'll see full season kids, prep kids, C.C., public and everything in between playing along side each other on the same lines. If you're that much of a standout you should be playing in the Midwest.
Not True..After Super 8 its pretty bad hockey.
The fact that a D3 MIAA(D3, not CC or even D1) kid dominated an entire team of prep kids at 16 states last weekend, says a lot..
Names, reputations and high priced schools don't help you put the puck in the net. Just check the box scores and the banner.
A dominant D3 02? Come on.
Leading scorer in state 16 tourney. Against the best of the best. Carried team to title. Yep. D3
JT didn't play "elite" either. Played 4 N*s.
Prep season is 3 months long - Is it worth the expense? Why not play high level split seasons and Public HS if it's good quality? Let's eliminate the top top preps - are they rest much better than top catholics or top publics. For the 9-10th grader why not play high end split season and public high school - if you're good move on from there. Tough to justify the expense for prep or the travel for full season??? It's really a shame how the high school hockey experience has changed so dramatically in 20 years.
I don't think anyone is saying MIAA is good as a WHOLE.
My point is that Prep or FS U16 isn't the end all be all for every good player, or even to develop good players.
There are still very good players at the MIAA level who can either move on to Prep later or Juniors, which most of the Prep/FS kids end up going anyways for ages 19/20. Split season and summer showcases prove it. There are MIAA kids all over the ice competing and doing well against the alleged cream of the crop Prepsters.
Playing MIAA in winter, good split in the Fall and quality summer showcases won't hurt a solid player one bit.
The best was the prep or full season dad hardo - "Yeah, but what about the kids who like to play real hockey?"
And the reply - "they're out in the Midwest playing in the USHL"
Hahahaha, never a hero in your home town!
Some of the traditional public strong teams look like they've lost their hockey players and are now fielding teams with kids who have hockey as their second or third sport. Won't be good is my guess.