Spent most of day watching. Pretty much everyone around me agreed that no one separated themselves from the rest. All pretty much interchangeable with a few exceptions that j use should not be out there. What’s the deal with the woman yelling.?
Lots of sub par players. RI was by far the worst. Teams were unevenly matched. Except for two or three CT kids not one of that contingent made a pass all weekend. Could've cut 30 players and had 4 teams that could play and it would've been a much better product. Lady yelling was from NH.
Completely agree !!
Very few surprises all weekend and of those that were given spots last year and were on the fence, likely will get bumped this year.
Seems that Coxie got it right again or perhaps he and the USA hockey guys are both wrong and you are right? Some came on here and predicted a new batch of kids and those who squeeked in last year would be out, are out. HMMM. Must have been pretty obvious who the good ones were.
Cocksie . . . hahahahaha . . . It’s fairly simple to pick out the superior talent when there’s a little puppy dog or kitty cat next to a players name. And a real evaluation of talent is rarely prefaced by stating that the expert has missed 70% of an event. Even a real evaluator with pedigree would have difficulty assessing such a large group after seeing just 30%. Cmon parents . . . It’s nothing to get worked up over or giddy about for that matter . . . “sees the ice” “strong edges” “can catch a pass”. Safe bet that no one making decisions at the next level is using this expertise to make decisions when their job is at stake.