Is it as much fun an hard to play as hockey
Lacrosse is a great sport... I think hockey is much harder just because of the time it takes to become a good skater. If you cant skate you cant play no matter how good of an athlete you are. Lax on the otherhand could be picked up quickly with some time in the driveway with a wall ball.
Take it to the lacrosse board guys.
I would buy tickets to watch some of the dads in this thread attempt to play in a lacrosse game. So much jiggling lard and heavy breathing! It would be hilarious. I'm guessing after 10 minutes of being repeatedly hacked with a lacrosse stick there would be a lot of "pulled muscles" and other mystery ailments.
I second the thought of watching these dads play anything.... love the guy that says lax is for failed hockey players. That is a person that never played a sport of any kind.... you would think having a Lax player on the Pats might make some people realize there are some very good athletes that don't play hockey...
It becomes a very physical sport from middle-school on which is something to keep in mind for players just getting done with a grueling hockey season. Still many kids like it because of the constant action and physical nature of the game
Compared to hockey it is hardly a physical sport. The biggest adjustment to 'physical play' is the constant, irritating slashing the ball carrier receives. Sure there is a bit more bumping than basketball and soccer but you hardly need size to play the game. The ground / turf is a lot more forgiving that ice, the speed of the collisions is much less and you never have to worry about going full blast into the boards.
The path to playing in college is totally different. We always point to a couple kids who live down the street from each other in our town. One was a very good hockey player, left his D-I / Super 8 high school team for prep, repeated a year, paid prep bills for two years, played in all of the showcase tournaments and maybe took a month a year off, was the captain of his team, started looking for a junior team to latch onto and then struggled to find a D-3 college team to take him. A couple doors down is a kid who is 6'2 and maybe 240 pounds of not much muscle...worse than a classic 'Dad Bod.' Kid can barely run the length of a lacrosse field, never works out (obviously), not too bright....and guess what? They both play a NCAA D-3 sport...at the same school!
The lax dads taking the same bait all of the E9 dads take. Nobody really thinks lacrosse is easy, just like nobody really thinks the E9 is substantially inferior to EHF Elite.
So the fat kid and the hockey "player" go to the same college.... the hockey player repeated a year when going to prep school and then took an extra year after high school to play juniors and the fat kid is the one that is not very bright? Sounds to me like the 21 year old freshman hockey player might be the one that is not very bright...... and keep in mind lax teams carry 40 kids and 16 ever touch the field so the fat slow kid will never play.