The Official New England Ice Hockey DBoard
Click Here to Visit Our Facebook Page
You beat me to it. Delta between MI and MA is .0006 or .06%. Not statistically significant. Not sure what the OP was trying to say except it's hard to get a D1 commit no matter where you live. On the bright side it's close to a 100% chance to get a beer league commit so let's keep the debate going on who has the best team/league/state for youth hockey.
data - you don't see that too much on here. I do think it would be more interesting though to see the commits broken down by dad played in college/nhl or is connected vs. not especially relative to the other states. I bet its under 10 out of the 56 here in mass :face_with_rolling_eyes:
Are those the total number of hockey players in those states? Shouldn’t you only use the total number of players who would be eligible to commit?
On another note Murray your daughter is pretty cute. We're going to the movies later. Don't worry I won't miss practice and hope I don't get benched. By the way, I grew up in NY but played Junior in Canada. What are my chances for a D1 commit or should I just go pro? Sincerely, Dean Youngblood
I do not think you're going anywhere with coaches daughter. It's that time again...time for tea, Ms. McGill
Mass registration numbers by age below.
Total Massachusetts USA hockey registrations: 41,794
I see the Murray's point. If this data is combined with active NHL players from MA, MI and MN or on the USNDTP, there is a correlation and it would be statistically significant. In fact, I'd argue that the separation gets greater.
MN - 55 Active NHL Players
MI - 42 active NHL Players
MA - 24 active NHL Players
MN - 3 players
MI - 4 players
MA - 1 player
Murray Chadwick may be a mongoloid, but MA has ZERO kids on the u17 USNDTP to MN’s 5. I seen it
is it actually 0 from MA?
So the totals are between u17 and u18
9 from MN
3 from MA 0 o n u18? No Hingham no Norwell>
A lot of wasted ink here but the OP's main point remains unaddressed - what are MN/MI doing differently to get better outcomes, assuming the MA youth hockey gene pool isn't materially different/worse.
I have no clue. Have never been to MI or MN. People say MN kids only play town hockey until HS, but I'm not sure why that matters. MA has too many clubs so the talent is thinned out, but on the other hand how is town any better at concentrating the talent? Only other thing I can think of is that MN/MI get colder so maybe they get more outdoor hockey time.
How South Americans play pick up soccer all day long Minnesotans play pick up hockey all day long
We have too much hockey that claims to be elite. We have too many people trying to make a quick buck with their “elite in name only” teams and summer tournaments. By the time you reach high school age, you have your local high school, hockey academies, Catholic conference, prep schools and full season teams as options. All these right now are fighting for air with prep / half season and maybe 2 full season teams remaining the top option - for now. We play with local teams so much, talk about ourselves so much, that a lot of people are unaware how good the Midwest kids are. Once and if our kids make it to juniors (and I mean Tier 1 and 2), you look back and think, there was too much ego and not enough joy and development in NE. Anyone here formerly from MN or MI to add a point? (Consider also that not everyone who commits to D1 actually makes the team, and if they make the team, they may sit a lot).
You should do New England many players play over state lines in the FED.